Les nouveautés et Tutoriels de Votre Codeur | SEO | Création de site web | Création de logiciel

salam every one, this is a topic from google web master centrale blog:

About a year ago, in response to user feedback, we created a paid links reporting form within Webmaster Tools. User feedback, through reporting paid links, webspam, or suggestions in our Webmaster Help Group, has been invaluable in ensuring that the quality of our index and our tools is as high as possible. Today, I'd like to highlight the impact that reporting paid links and webspam has had on our index. In a future post, I'll showcase how user feedback and concerns in the Webmaster Help Group have helped us improve our Help Center documentation and Webmaster Tools.

Reporting Paid Links

As mentioned in the post Information about buying and selling links that pass PageRank, Google reserves the right to take action on sites that buy or sell links that pass PageRank for the purpose of manipulating search engine rankings. Even though we work hard to discount these links through algorithmic detection, if you see a site that is buying or selling links that pass PageRank, please let us know. Over the last year, users have submitted thousands and thousands of paid link reports to Google, and each report can contain multiple websites that are suspected of selling links. These reports are actively reviewed, and the feedback is invaluable to improve our search algorithms. We also are willing to take manual action on a significant fraction of paid link reports as we continue to improve our algorithms. More importantly, the hard work of users who have already reported paid links has helped improve the quality of our index for millions. For more information on reporting paid links, check out this Help Center article.

Reporting Webspam

Google has also provided a form to report general webspam since November 2001. We appreciate users who alert us to potential abuses for the sake of the whole Internet community. Spam reports come in two flavors: an authenticated form that requires registration in Webmaster Tools, and an unauthenticated form. We receive hundreds of reports each day. Spam reports to the authenticated form are given more weight and are individually investigated more often. Spam reports to the unauthenticated form are assessed in terms of impact, and a large fraction of those are reviewed as well. As Udi Manber, VP of Engineering & Search Quality mentioned in his recent blog post on our Official Google Blog, in 2007 more than 450 new improvements were made to our search algorithms. A number of those improvements were related to webspam. It's not an understatement to say that users who have taken the time to report spam were essential to many of those algorithmic enhancements.

Going forward

As users' expectations of search increase daily, we know it's important to provide a high quality index with relevant results. We're always happy to hear stories in our Webmaster Help Group from users who have have reported spam with noticeable results in our Webmaster Help Group. Now that you know how Google uses feedback to improve our search quality, you may want to tell us about webspam you've seen in our results. Please use our authenticated form to report paid links or other types of webspam. Thanks again for taking the time to help us improve.this is a topic published in 2013... to get contents for your blog or your forum, just contact me at: devnasser@gmail.com
Seo Master present to you:

Reasons You Would Need To Convert Wma To Mp3

WMA and MP3 files are very similar because they sound nearly the same in terms of quality, are both relatively small files and they only support audio information. At the same time, there are many reasons why you should convert a WMA into an MP3. This is especially true if you aren’t running the Windows OS or if you enjoy using mobile technology.

Apple Computers:

The Apple OS has exponentially increased in popularity due to the iPhone, iPod and iPad. While WMAs can be used on an Apple computer, it can be fairly difficult. This is because this OS is not natively meant to use these files since they were made for a Windows environment. You can get around this by using a special Mac WMA player, but the player just temporarily converts the WMA into a suitable format for the Mac. This means that you often need to wait a few seconds for this temporary conversion to finish before the file will play.

It’s much easier to play MP3 files within an Apple environment. QuickTime easily supports these files and you don’t need any special software.

Mobile Devices:

While there are some mobile devices that can play WMA files, mostly Windows devices, the vast majority of tablets and smartphones are meant to work with MP3s. This is often because MP3 files are somewhat easier to play and they have become very popular due to overwhelming support from many Apple mobile devices. MP3s also don’t have a security protocol, which means that the programs needed to play them are much easier to build when compared to making a WMA player.

If you have an Apple, Android or BlackBerry device, then it’s a good idea to convert your WMAs into MP3s. It’s a good idea to convert the files into MP3s anyway because every mobile device, even Windows ones, support MP3 files due to their popularity.

Smaller Footprint:

Though they are both relatively small formats that don’t require much memory, MP3s are often smaller than WMAs. Not only that, but their quality is similar in most situations. There’s no reason to use WMAs if space is an issue. You can often reduce your media library by about 50MB to 100MB by converting your files, depending on how large your media library is.

The reason why MP3s are smaller is because they disregard inaudible noise. WMAs will keep this information in the file, but MP3s will erase it so that the file has to support less overall data.

Somewhat Better Quality:

While both of these formats are similar when it comes to quality, many people consider MP3s slightly better. This is usually the case if the file is set to a moderate or high bit rate. Some people can’t tell the difference, but many audiophiles agree that MP3s are superior to WMAs.

The only time when this is different is if the bit rate is set very low. WMAs tend to be better in this scenario, but the difference is slight.

iTunes Support:

Many people love using iTunes even if they don’t have an Apple device because this makes it very easy to manage your media library. While there are other interfaces that offer similar functions and capabilities, few programs have been able to rival iTunes in terms of popularity and overall support. The problem is that iTunes is fairly exclusive when it comes to file support.

iTunes will not accept WMA files. You must convert the audio files into MP3s if you want to add them to iTunes.

Versatility:

WMA files are not as versatile as MP3s. This isn’t because WMAs are inferior. It’s because MP3s have much more support. MP3 files can be used with many media library interfaces, mobile devices, editing programs and so on. WMAs are sometimes supported by these programs, but not as often as MP3s. If you want a file that is very versatile, then you need to convert your files into MP3s.

Conclusion:

While both formats are great and have their own advantages, many people consider the MP3 a superior format. This is because the files are usually smaller, sound better, work with most mobile devices and have more support. If you want all of these advantages, then just convert your WMA files. The entire process shouldn’t take long since most audio files are relatively small.




Author Bio:
Katelyn Roberts is a video and music blogger who use KoyoteSoft when creating videos and sharing them online. KoyoteSoft.com can convert wma to mp3 with ease.
2013, By: Seo Master
Seo Master present to you:

Media.net is a contextual advertising network similar to AdSense with Yahoo! Bing network 
shaking hands with media.net to provide better revenue earning systems to publishers. Its relatively new to AdSense and is seen as better AdSense alternative. However, my personal experience till date is not so encouraging. 

▌How I got approved. 
There is no sign-up process. You request an invite from their website filling out all the details and they will manually review every site / blog. If they find your blog complying with their policies, they will accept you. I didn't have much problem getting approved since I already have optimized my site in accordance to AdSense program policies and more or less, its same for Media.net. You may want to read how to get approved by AdSense. 
 
▌Whats benefit of Media.net? 

○ The Ads are very much targeted and contextual. So you don't have to worry much about bad User experience. 

○ A very good customer support. Mail them any problem you have, and they will reply you within 48 hours. That never works with AdSense. 

○ Really less chances of getting banned like AdSense. Even if you are, you have someone to ask the reason, and most probably you will be replied. 

○ Ads are new. Visitors have become blind to AdSense ad units. Media.net provide new Ads sizes and units and customization is much easier and better. 
 
▌After Approval, 1st week. 
I placed one Ad unit each on 2 of my blogs. The earning was simply amazing. Yeah!! The minimum RPM was $2. i earned an RPM of even 18$ for one particular day. I was damn excited. I started replacing AdSense ad units with Media.net units, downgrading AdSense to second choice for earning. It went the same for almost 2 weeks. 

▌What Next!! 
zero RPM media.net
RPM dropped to zero! I thought it may be due to any traffic problem or my blog may not have generated quality traffic. But the RPM never really increased till date. I am still keeping one ad unit on each blog, but RPM is still zero. For the last 2k visitors, I have earned zero.


▌Why I switched Back to AdSense. 


○ With AdSense, at least I know how i get paid. How much clicks I received and CPC. Media.net is not transparent enough. They don't tell you how you earned, whether it was Clicks or impressions that increased your balance. 

○ Each site needs to be approved. If i maintain 10 blogs, I have to apply for each blog separately. With AdSense, if you are approved once, you can place ads on any blog/websites that complies with AdSense program policies. 

○ Not suitable for blogger domains. If you have a blog blog.blogspot.com, then perhaps you will miss a good amount of visitors. Google has incorporated Blogger's domain redirection.  That means you will have to get approved for each of the domain separately .com, .in, .au, and the list is endless. 


▌Now what I am gonna do. 
I will keep this option for another month with a close eye on my earning. If the RPM sticks to zero, I will remove the Ads and believe that old rule, "AdSense is best". 

Have you tried Media.net? Whats your experience? Share with us. 

mb.
2013, By: Seo Master
Powered by Blogger.